01 / PURPOSE
What it is for
Compare independent approaches to one mission while keeping their intermediate histories separate until evaluation.
01 · TOPOLOGY PROFILE
Trinity
Three-world baseline with twelve controlled variants.
The baseline runs three candidate worlds from a comparable start. Variant runners can add structured routing, evidence review, extra cells, replicas, or bounded child missions before the comparative gate.
PARTIAL · 12 RUNNERS WIRED · QUALIFICATION PENDING02 / SELECTION
When to use it
Choose Trinity when parallel candidate work fits the budget and can be evaluated against shared constraints. Mission signals may select a preset automatically; missing preconditions fall back to the controlled baseline. A selected preset still needs its own output evidence.
03 / SCIENTIFIC BASIS
Inspiration
and limits.
Its useful foundations are controlled comparison, independent replication, and multi-objective selection. The three-world name is a runtime design, not a claim of a specific biological mechanism.
RUNTIME PATH
What is wired
All twelve variant runners are connected to the mission/supervisor path with variant-specific completion gates.
KNOWN BOUNDARY
What this does not imply
R3 predates the wiring corrections: all twelve missions escalated and none merged. The corrected paths have not yet completed a post-correction end-to-end qualification.
01 / MODELThe principle
The principle
and its equation
The controlled baseline runs three independent worlds from a comparable initial state and compares sealed evidence. Other variants use dedicated runners and gates; some add a 16-cell grid, replicas, or bounded child missions. A connected runner is not proof of a valid result.
SIMPLIFIED FORMALIZATION
D = (x₁, x₂, x₃) ; scoreᵢ = f(evidenceᵢ, constraints) ; eligibleᵢ ⇔ evidenceᵢ ≥ threshold
f represents a stated comparison rule, not a learned probability. Selection can retain several non-dominated solutions; promoting a candidate is not a production deployment.
02 / VARIANTS AND USE CASES
Choose a policy
Select a variant to explore steps based on its documented contract. This illustration does not run agents or call runtime services.
LOCAL SIMULATION · ILLUSTRATIVE01 / 12
controlled POLICY IMPLEMENTED
Reproducible baseline: compare three fixed strategies on a migration or code review.
TOPOLOGY MAP · ILLUSTRATION ONLY · NO AGENT EXECUTED
1/4 · Create one read-only snapshot
The drawing changes with the topology and variant to show their documented structure and policy. It is an explanatory model; maturity labels and runtime limits still apply.
This status follows the maturity of the variant policy in GenOS’ canonical catalog. “Policy implemented” does not certify end-to-end execution: topology maturity, required adapters, permissions, and evidence remain separate runtime conditions. This illustration does not run agents; its selector is manual. In the runtime, mission signals may select a preset automatically when its preconditions are met.
FAILURE MODES
What can go wrong
- Correlated strategies can share the same blind spot; an assigned model family does not prove the effective route.
- Missing cells, distributions, interventions, child lineage, or deliberation receipts must fail the variant gate.
- R3 ran before the wiring corrections and ended 12/12 ESCALATE with no merge; the corrected paths still need an end-to-end qualification.
- A passing promotion gate does not deploy or certify a production system.
EVIDENCE AND BENCHMARKS
What has been checked
Working slice: Twelve runners share comparison, isolated execution, bounded research and persisted resume guards with targeted runtime tests.
Still open: The pre-correction R3 campaign ended 12/12 ESCALATE and 0 merge; no corrected-path real-mission campaign is published.
Linked evidence: integration. A policy for a variant does not establish a successful end-to-end mission or comparative performance.
No topology-specific benchmark protocol is linked from this profile.
Read the latest evidence ↗Read the product completion contract ↗