← ALL TOPOLOGIES
04 · TOPOLOGY PROFILE

Holobiont
A host, symbionts and lifecycle contracts.

An orchestrating host composes specialist symbionts around mission capabilities, governs their lifecycle, and constrains execution through resource and capability contracts.

PARTIAL · PARTIAL · HOST VETO VERIFIED
IMPLEMENTATIONPartial
RUNTIME INTEGRATIONWired
EVIDENCEIntegration tested
LAST REVIEWED SOURCEGenOS 5091f70 ↗

The canonical contract records a 55-script Holobiont suite, including host veto against threat signatures, cognitive drift and empty deliverables. The guarantee remains scoped to those contracts and adapters.

01 / PURPOSE

What it is for

Compose specialist capabilities around a host that keeps authority, resource allocation, and lifecycle state visible.

02 / SELECTION

When to use it

Choose Holobiont when a mission needs a set of bounded specialist services coordinated by a host. Every capability and executor must be supplied under the run contract.

03 / SCIENTIFIC BASIS

Inspiration
and limits.

The host–symbiont relationship is an ecological analogy translated into contracts, provisioning, execution, and health records. It does not imply automatic immunity or biological equivalence.

RUNTIME PATH

What is wired

The shared mission runtime connects admission, supplied capabilities, independent verification, immune gates, quotas, health sanctions and atomic contribution/memory updates.

KNOWN BOUNDARY

What this does not imply

The host adapters still supply physical isolation and real measurements. Passing the bounded runtime does not demonstrate biological symbiosis or a general longitudinal gain.

V3 · MISSION PROTOCOL

Host and symbiont qualification

The protocol must record host authority, admitted resident capabilities, resource allocation, action receipts, health, contribution and succession. A supplied capability does not imply that an immune veto ran.

Read the canonical mission protocol ↗
PROOF BOUNDARY

What remains to run

The longitudinal benchmark is a protocol, not a completed comparative campaign. The historical four-role composer does not automatically use the persistent host runtime.

Read the dedicated benchmark protocol ↗
01 / MODEL

The principle
and its equation

A host coordinates specialist symbionts under capability and resource contracts. The host sets boundaries and composes skills; veto or immune mechanisms are not guaranteed in every execution path.

SIMPLIFIED FORMALIZATION

Cₘ ⊆ ⋃ᵢ Cᵢ ; allocationᵢ ≥ 0 ; Σᵢ allocationᵢ ≤ budgetₘ

Required capabilities Cₘ must be covered by symbiont capabilities Cᵢ. Budget compliance depends on the allocation contract; this formula does not model full safety.

02 / VARIANTS AND USE CASES

Choose a policy

Select a variant to explore steps based on its documented contract. This illustration does not run agents or call runtime services.

LOCAL SIMULATION · ILLUSTRATIVE01 / 12

organelle PARTIAL POLICY

Decompose a system into highly specialized symbionts around a coordinating host.

CORE CAPABILITIES · HOST AUTHORITYHOST COREidentity · invariantsMEMORYlineageSPECIALISTcore capabilityIMMUNEvalidationSPECIALISTcore capabilityconcept: deeply integrated residents · any core replacement needs host approvalPOLICY STAGE 01 / 04ORGANELLETOPOLOGY MAP · ILLUSTRATION ONLY · NO AGENT EXECUTED
1/4 · Keep host identity and authority central

The drawing changes with the topology and variant to show their documented structure and policy. It is an explanatory model; maturity labels and runtime limits still apply.

This status follows the maturity of the variant policy in GenOS’ canonical catalog. “Policy implemented” does not certify end-to-end execution: topology maturity, required adapters, permissions, and evidence remain separate runtime conditions. This illustration does not run agents; its selector is manual. In the runtime, mission signals may select a preset automatically when its preconditions are met.

FAILURE MODES

What can go wrong

  • A required capability may have no admissible executor.
  • Resource allocation can constrain or prevent a planned cycle.
  • Host veto and immune checks are not guaranteed on every path.
EVIDENCE AND BENCHMARKS

What has been checked

Working slice: The shared mission runtime connects capability admission, independent verification, immune gates, quotas and atomic contribution/memory updates; the 55-script suite includes robust host-veto cases.

Still open: Physical isolation and measurements remain adapter responsibilities; no general or longitudinal gain is established.

Linked evidence: integration. A policy for a variant does not establish a successful end-to-end mission or comparative performance.

Read the benchmark protocol ↗Read the latest evidence ↗Read the product completion contract ↗
CANONICAL CONTRACTRead the Holobiont documentation ↗Compare capability contracts ↗Read plugin boundaries ↗
EXPLORE MOREAdjust this topology model →Morphogenesis Lab →Evidence ledger →