GENOS LAB · P2 MODELS
SIMULATIONA simplified model running in the browser. It explains an idea and proves nothing about the runtime.

Change a signal.
See the model respond.

Explore eight topology models and seven concept models with bounded, inspectable inputs. Each result is computed in your browser and labeled as a teaching simulation.

TOPOLOGY MODEL · LOCAL SIMULATION

Rhizome

Trace direct capability links, bridges, and gaps in a changing graph.

BROWSER SIMULATION
SIMULATED RESULTBOUNDED ROUTE

A bounded capability route is available

This browser model simplifies route coverage. The runtime supports bounded multi-hop routing; adding edges still requires graph-growth gates, and a route does not prove provider startup.

Capability coverage63%
Required gap55%
Exploration budget60%
  1. 01Identify capability gap
  2. 02Search within declared bounds
  3. 03Rank a reachable route
  4. 04Validate route and provider evidence

Teaching model only. It does not call GenOS, execute agents, prove a claim, or represent a recorded run.

COMPARABLE EXPERIMENT PROTOCOL · PROPOSED

A question this model cannot answer alone

Hypothesis
Does capability-link exploration find more useful routes than direct member selection at equal budget?
Control
Direct selection from the same composed member set.
Measure
Verified reachable tasks, search cost, and invalid or missing routes.
Falsifier
No route-coverage gain at equal budget, or added routes fail verification.

Pre-register task population, software/model versions, random seeds, and a shared budget before running either arm. The browser simulation is not evidence for this hypothesis.

READ THE OUTPUT

These models help explain policies and relationships. They do not call GenOS services or provide runtime evidence. Follow each concept or topology profile for its actual implementation status, source, and limitations.