A vocabulary for discussing computational indicators while separating them from claims of subjective experience.
Mind and consciousness taxonomy
in GenOS.
A vocabulary for discussing computational indicators while separating them from claims of subjective experience.
What it means
in GenOS.
Consciousness research distinguishes behavioral access, reportability and subjective experience. A software indicator can test a functional property; it cannot establish phenomenology without an accepted bridge principle.
A vocabulary for discussing computational indicators while separating them from claims of subjective experience.
Let I be a vector of separately measured indicators under test conditions T. Report I and uncertainty U(I|T); do not infer subjective experience S from I without a validated implication I⇒S.
Explore the mechanism: Mind and consciousness taxonomy
A qualitative teaching model of this concept. It does not run GenOS or validate its implementation.
The modeled transition may proceed. Change the assumption and move through the stages to inspect the decision path.
How it works
at a glance.
Name a claimed property
A vocabulary for discussing computational indicators while separating them from claims of subjective experience.
Separate observable indicators
Let I be a vector of separately measured indicators under test conditions T. Report I and uncertainty U(I|T); do not infer subjective experience S from I without a validated implication I⇒S.
Limit the inference
Limit the inference. Consciousness research distinguishes behavioral access, reportability and subjective experience. A software indicator can test a functional property; it cannot establish phenomenology without an accepted bridge principle.
What is connected,
and how far.
The linked, versioned GenOS source defines this concept's supported operations and limits. The status axes describe the implementation and evidence recorded for this entry; they do not establish general mission success, scientific equivalence or behavior beyond that scope.
Documentary concept entry: no GenOS implementation slice or concept-specific product evidence is linked to this entry.
Failure modes have not yet been separately cataloged for this entry; follow the source and evidence links before relying on the mechanism.
No implementation file is pinned to this concept entry yet.
The mechanism
behind the analogy.
Towards a cognitive neuroscience of consciousness: basic evidence and a workspace framework
Stanislas Dehaene and Lionel Naccache · Cognition 79(1–2), 1–37
A primary theoretical and empirical synthesis. It does not establish consciousness in a software workspace.
Open publication ↗Primary research describes the cited mechanism; specific technologies may instead cite their original technical documentation. These sources provide context and do not validate the GenOS implementation.
Scope and validation boundaries
The linked, versioned GenOS source defines this concept's supported operations and limits. The status axes describe the implementation and evidence recorded for this entry; they do not establish general mission success, scientific equivalence or behavior beyond that scope.